Good talk.
1 Like
So weâve advanced to the âactually, who cares if he is shitting up the COVID thread?â phase of the apologia. Gosh, you shouldnât be getting public health updates from UP, why not let Church troll it up?
Folks have proposed alternatives (less heavy handed moderation and biased standards), you popped in to drudge up more on COVID thread which is the gasoline on the fire.
More moderation for innocuous posting isnât really an answer to healing fractures. Itâs just you digging in.
1 Like
No weâve advanced to the place where we started, you all throwing shit against the wall.
2 Likes
It would not have been unless the key conclusion churchill highlighted was changed substantially due to an obvious methodological flaw spotted immediately by posters here.
Please stop.
4 Likes
I know you think youâre clever, but youâre really not.
1 Like
Im starting to think that instead of trying to help the situation you unironically posted that you are trying to solve the problem and others (unspecified but they are suppose to know who they are) are throwing gasoline. Unironically. You didnt post it to show how saying others are throwing gasoline is in fact throwing gasoline. You unironically wrote it.
I think he was showing everyone he realized how poor his posts have been and that he learnt that his low content and trolling are destroying the forum.
It wasnât unironic. He was conceding and asking remorse. I appreciate that.
1 Like
No the point is that people post all kinds of bonkers shit all over this website but punishment is handed out unevenly. So instead of ramping up the bannings 10 or 20 fold, we should just not ban people for being wrong.
1 Like
Btw im sitting in a parking lot picking up my 5 year old from his 2nd shot of pfizer vax. Hooray science
5 Likes
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAA
7 Likes
Maybe we can just get back together every once in a while for some regrettable drunk sex?
2 Likes
We should never move past that phase in any thread. Who cares.
1 Like
My perception is that churchill has been asked multiple times to provide links or citations for some of the things he posts. This leads to a round of arguing about his failure to link or cite. Despite this, he occasionally still makes posts that lead to this complaining.
My judgement is that heâs either bad at posting or he wants this arguing to go on.
The validity of Dr. Nurse John or preprints seem relatively unimportant to me. It might also not matter if his tactics resemble those of conspiracy theorists like 9/11 truthers. The forum is for arguing, but churchill posts some stuff that leads to dumb arguments. And that is a churchill problem, not a CN and Wookie problem.
In which case? It has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that at least in the case of Barbara A. Cohn study the link was given and deleted by a mod and Churchil was wrongly treated. The fact that the study proved to be significant makes it more embarrassing scientific-wise for the group, but thatâs beside the point.
Maybe you are referring to the other case.
I do wonder if Barbara is aware that her research was barked at by the Anti-Vax dog.
My perception is based on my recollection that I have asked churchill for links with unsatisfying results.
I really am curious if any of you idiots eventually realize that youâre addicted to arguing and that the size of Churchillâs big toe isnât actually meaningful to any of your reasonings for being here.
4 Likes
Iâm curious to hear how you explain away the second case.
I have no idea what it is. Iâll give it a shot later if iâm provided all the details by a reliable source like MakeHaste. Maybe Church is guilty there. It wonât shock me.
But I do need you to show some learning curve here, otherwise Iâm just been given home work that seem futile.
Do you now understand why your approach, in which you consider the mean of communication in which a person heard of a study to be more important than the study itself, is anti-scientific?
Even after many explanations and knowing that the actual study was posted here and is in fact an important paper done by epidemiologists and published in the highest academic journal, you held your position that the place Church heard about it is still a citation required by a forum and deserve a 2 day break if it is not provided. Do you understand how anti science that is now?
If you are just trolling me and arenât actually curious thatâs fine too. We are after all idiots and something about toes.