There are dozens of posters there who regularly post both there and here and have never engaged in any forum feuds. Some of them have posted in this very thread.
You may want to think everyone there is plotting to burn down UP, but that’s simply just wrong. It isn’t any more true than asserting that this site was launched to burn down 2p2. Some people here wanted to stay part of 2p2 community, some didn’t, some never were part of 2p2. Not everyone at the other site is even from UP.
The reason the other site isn’t discussed more openly here is because many there want to stay part of this community, and it would be just as rude to laud that site here as it would be to laud UP on 2p2.
Requoting a goofy requote…
The funny thing is that the other site is by no means a group think. There are even posters there that openly dislike each other. There is disagreement in threads. There are alternative viewpoints.
The difference is that no one person or group of persons has the power to silence other views. Contrary to what many think here, open trolling and fighting isn’t what anybody wants (well maybe a couple, but nobody is defending them). If there were a spammer or blatant racist or other obvious troublemaking, it would probably be handled in some way that’s not dramatic. But without recourse to ban or silence posters based on highly subjective tastes, there really is no drama. Everyone behaves like an adult. If people get mad, they vent and move on. Nobody wins any points by getting someone kicked off. The difference between that and here is stark.
That doesn’t mean this should get rid of moderation. Nobody has really asked for that.l, and nobody to my knowledge at the other site, thinks UP should be modeled exactly the same as that site. That’s no different than posters here who are happy to participate at 2p2 or other forums with different site models.
I think what many here want, at least those that were either disenfranchised from participating or sympathetic to those that were, is a forum more tolerant of different viewpoints held by long time posters. Those posters have invested their time and energy to voluntarily participate in this community, as reg poster, occasional poster, or even lurker.
That tolerance can certainly include temp bans and even permanent if needed, but that should be a very high bar that should be obvious to an overwhelming majority of the community. As we saw with Wookies recent RFC to perma Churchill, posts that some saw as egregious others see as completely benign. We’ve also seen how many want one side to eat bans without a whimper (which they usually do), but then often complain loudly when they receive them. We literally just saw that (again) yesterday. That’s the crux of the drama, it plays out that way every flare up.
A sense of more fairness and respect, even to unpopular but regular posters, is warranted. The poster you may dislike may be the same poster others elsewhere on the site enjoy interacting with, perhaps just reading their views even if they disagree. When you punish that poster, you punish them as well.
I hope this doesn’t garnet a typical “hahahahaha lolol hypocrite” type of response. The forum is a lot better when folks aren’t constantly trying to score points. That includes everyone.