Didn’t post this during the RFC, and I’m mostly what some call a leech in the community, but this personally struck me as problematic. A screenshot was posted (since deleted) and citation was requested but withheld.
It’s not just the effort that went into determining the source but the acknowledgement that the source was withheld because it would be challenged. The study cited was also problematic (although there are merits of discussing those things). And the icing was another *unprompted points uk vs us dunk (which I’ve never understood) since most in the thread also agree the US response was bad and the implication that others in the thread were advocating for no boosters which I don’t recall happening (and if it did it was isolated and not the reason for disputing the study or the youtuber citing the study).
(*Edit: Yuv correctly pointed out that CN criticized Churchill’s bias towards the youtuber for being a Brit, so the response was not unprompted.)