No, that is not the Republican position. Of course, you know that is not the Republican position. But itâs unlikely in my opinion than anyone other than me will call you out on this nonsense since Iâm not part of the UP Support Group for Disgruntled Libs.
are you kidding? this is the LOW ENERGY, SAD vibe that trump has been pushing about biden the last 4 years. this is aimed at exactly one person and it absolutely infuriates him
The question was about whether there was anything inherently appealing about Harris. I was actually answering the question that was asked.
Having said that, when she was a Senator, I was entertained by her aggressive âFederal Prosecutorâ style of grilling witnesses in Committee hearings.
In seemed like her IQ dropped about 30 points when she became VP.
Itâs not off by much. The Republican position is more accurately that of evangelical Christians, that sex is strictly for procreation and women who have sex outside of marriage should be punished by forcing âconsequencesâ of child birth on them.
The âsex is strictly for procreationâ is the official position of the Roman Catholic Church. I donât believe that is close to being a majority view among Evangelicals. (Or among Catholic laypeople, for that matter.)
Iâve never heard of any prominent Christian writer or clergyman who would consider pregnancy a âpunishmentâ for sex outside of marriage. It could certainly be a deterrent, of course.
My best hypothesis is that this age group is hard to reach and thus hard to sample. I really doubt itâs going Trump. If it does Kamala has no chance.
Per the crosstabs, 27% of respondents were in that age group (one of four groups). I mean I donât believe the number either combined with an overall pro-Harris poll, but now itâs not the only one of these weâve seen.