2024 US Presidential Election (Taylor's Version)

Speak for yourself

No, that is not the Republican position. Of course, you know that is not the Republican position. But it’s unlikely in my opinion than anyone other than me will call you out on this nonsense since I’m not part of the UP Support Group for Disgruntled Libs.

are you kidding? this is the LOW ENERGY, SAD vibe that trump has been pushing about biden the last 4 years. this is aimed at exactly one person and it absolutely infuriates him

1 Like

Yes it is

No.

Shocking that a Trump supporter doesn’t find anything appealing about Kamala. Really didn’t see that one coming.

3 Likes

No it isn’t.

Why in gods name are people back responding to lag?!l?

10 Likes

I did get a chuckle out of Coasterbrad’s post. So that was worth a few seconds.

lag decloaked previously; seems more like unraveling now.

The question was about whether there was anything inherently appealing about Harris. I was actually answering the question that was asked.

Having said that, when she was a Senator, I was entertained by her aggressive “Federal Prosecutor” style of grilling witnesses in Committee hearings.

In seemed like her IQ dropped about 30 points when she became VP.

For example:

Reporter: You haven’t been to the border.

Harris: I haven’t been to Europe either

Yep. Maybe unraveling.
Has the algorithm run out?

Maybe because some folks aren’t emotionally fragile and enjoy engaging other folks with views that differ from the UP Support Group?

I’m now waiting for the “Love your contribution; can’t wait to read more of your posts” attempt at being condescending”

Opes. Did it - in a different form tho’.
I’ll give myself a 50% for calling the condescension attempt. I failed on the wording.

Note well that I only use that splendid line in response to a condescending post about me.

It’s not off by much. The Republican position is more accurately that of evangelical Christians, that sex is strictly for procreation and women who have sex outside of marriage should be punished by forcing “consequences” of child birth on them.

1 Like

You are too modest. I think you should at least get 75% credit!

  1. The “sex is strictly for procreation” is the official position of the Roman Catholic Church. I don’t believe that is close to being a majority view among Evangelicals. (Or among Catholic laypeople, for that matter.)

  2. I’ve never heard of any prominent Christian writer or clergyman who would consider pregnancy a “punishment” for sex outside of marriage. It could certainly be a deterrent, of course.

My best hypothesis is that this age group is hard to reach and thus hard to sample. I really doubt it’s going Trump. If it does Kamala has no chance.

3 Likes

Per the crosstabs, 27% of respondents were in that age group (one of four groups). I mean I don’t believe the number either combined with an overall pro-Harris poll, but now it’s not the only one of these we’ve seen.

1 Like