Iâm still queasy about the idea of a random number from an infinite range. No matter what number you come up with, there will always be infinite numbers bigger than it.
Well I donât understand this at all, in addition to being dumb I am missing something. Anyway, I am probably playing the opposite of this. If Spidercrab tells me the first number is a billion and two I am still switching. I know what you are up to.
If you read the replies on that twitter thread theyâre not assuming that at all. Theyâre also talking about negative numbers. Theyâre saying you donât know the range, which I think is crucial to the game.
If you know the range is between 0 and 1, then you just pick again if the first number is below .50000000, right?
Here is a fun one I just heard. Letâs say I take a random number between 0 and 1 and take the square root. Then I take two random numbers between 0 and 1 and take the higher of the two.
Thereâs a fairly long history of experts not being able to accept that simple statistical algorithms outperform them. Before AI. Before moneyball. Someday Iâll look up that one paper. Maybe even read it.