What are you reading?

I just rewatched Pitch Perfect. I thought wow always so good. It’s nice when music me is here for the good stuff.

Then I finally noticed it’s based on a book…of nonfiction!

The investigation into college a capella societies was so rich that it inspired three movies and endless copycats.

The opening paragraph has me ready to read this first thing in the morning.

What amazed me was the amount of time the Whiffenpoofs demanded from them, the way their membership in the group seemed to define their entire identity. Most of their time outside class was consumed by Whiffenpoof functions; even their vacations were given over to the Whiffenpoof tours. It was true that they got to sleep with Whiffenpoof groupies and visit great Whiffenpoof places—you couldn’t brush your teeth next to one of them without hearing about their latest junket to Monaco or Bermuda—but it still didn’t seem like a worthwhile trade-off to me. The way I saw it, no amount of sex or travel would compensate for the humiliation of belonging to a group with such a stupid name.

In the last few weeks finished Middlesex and A Thousand Acres

Middlesex is just one of those books. 50 pages into a 600 page book and you know. Just really good and one I’ll never forget

A thousand acres was good. I really liked the characters and the setting

It hurts it a little that I read Middlesex directly after. Man what a book.

2 Likes

Yes, a very solid book.

I only vaguely remember it, but I recall having really liked it. What I do remember is a line in The Marriage Plot where the protagonists are talking about Anna Karenina. The guy says something like “Tolstoy will write these amazing paragraphs but you have to slog through fifty pages about land reform to get to them.” Still makes me chuckle.

1 Like

After reading about 15-20 Pulitzer Prizes winners for fiction in the last 18-24 months

I really come back to the amazing adventures of kavalier and clay. Really liked that one a lot.

On Comey’s new novel

And yet, I am also plagued by a kind of disappointment, which I felt as well when paging back through those Clinton novels or recalling Newt Gingrich’s mid-2010s Brooke Grant trilogy (completely absurd but, I am forced to admit, perfectly serviceable), Duplicity , Treason , and Vengeance . A sinking feeling: Is this all?

Because we do live in a golden age of conspiracy, an age of stories, and it is a bit disappointing to get from a former top G-man little more than the interagency rivalries that 75 years of TV cops, courts, Feds, and spooks have already burned into our brains. The most powerful people in the real world jet off to private sex islands. Justices of the Supreme Court hobnob at the Bohemian Grove with weird billionaires who collect Nazi memorabilia the way others accumulate rare stamps or unopened Star Wars action figures. The Deep State. Pizzagate. QAnon. Discord leaks. Reality Winner. Chinese spy balloons. Drones. A.I. Robot police dogs. A pervasive sense that beyond the veil lies another veil, and beyond that, a realm of decadent secret perversion and lies, a stygian realm of occult amorality, vast unaccountable agencies of secrets and death and war directing the vast energies of history toward some Luciferian end, while we poor proles labor under the illusions of free will, of self-determination, of democracy, or agency.

How sorry it is to discover that after eight years as president, or years as secretary of state or director of the FBI, the tales they produce are the same fantasies as any schlub watching Air Force One.

How deflating, then, to discover that the most these semiretired potentates of the great secret machinery of government can imagine amounts to a rip-off of more professionally written TV shows and mid-tier Hollywood action properties! How sorry it is to discover that after eight years as president, or after being the most powerful man in Congress, or years as secretary of state or director of the FBI, the tales they produce—the fantasies of those who actually held such power, who knew all the secrets—are the same fantasies as any schlub watching Air Force One while he irons shirts in an airport Sheraton on his way to a sales conference. It is as if Dan Brown rushed his wild investigators into the heart of the Vatican to discover only that the pope eats Cheerios for breakfast and enjoys reruns of Friends.

Of course, it might all be a feint: the dullness, the limited stories, the banality . It could all be a form of camouflage, to render the romanced dream lives of our rulers so utterly quotidian that we cease to wonder about the actual reality that must lie beneath. But somehow I don’t think so. They are all as depressingly ordinary as they appear; they have the same pop-culture-saturated ideas about terrorism, the Mafia, the cops, the spies, the operators, as the rest of us, chatbots endlessly recombining the same familiar stories in slightly different order. “He was one of us,” the poet Robert Lowell said of Mussolini, “Only, pure prose, and less miraculous.” Isn’t that sad? That at the end of the day, none of our great and powerful have much to reveal, and they are all exactly, depressingly, precisely what they appear to be.

1 Like

The fact that this is her real name :astonished:

I’m close to finishing fairy tale and hating it tbh, will finish and hopefully gets better but I just don’t gaf about the main character or anything in the world. Im not a big fan of fantasy stuff though so maybe that’s part of it.

3 Likes

https://twitter.com/danozzi/status/1668709496762556416?s=20

1 Like

Fine we’ll do it the hard way

6 Likes

I thought the stuff in his obituary about his childhood was interesting too. I didn’t know he grew up in absolute privilege with servants and stuff.

Realized I’ve read -0- Asimov. Which is crazy

Googled. Started with the foundation trilogy. The. Read the two books after and then the two prequels :slight_smile:

Seven books done. Realized it’s part of an entire universe. Got a copy of the complete robot so reading about robots

Love it.

The short stories are also good. “The Last Question” has come up here.

Once I get through the entire universe. The 3 sets of books and stories. I will read more of his work.

TIL that a short story i loved since i was a kid and thought was Asimov was actually by Sheckley. facepalming at myself.

1 Like

Been reading Stephen King’s Night Shift - which is a collection of about 20, mostly horror short stories published in the 70s, averaging about 20 pages a story. There is quite a noticeable difference in the density of each sentence between a 600 page king novel versus a 10 page short story. And it’s nice to be able to finish it in one sitting instead of having to consistently remind yourself of where the story left off amongst keeping yourself interested.

This vid does a good job of doing a somewhat spoiler free ranking of each story. I’ve read about half, and two of the stories have stuck with me a lot more than anything i’ve read since I was a kid.

Night Shift (1978 Collection) | All 20 Short Stories RANKED! | A Great UndertaKING - YouTube

1 Like

A great undertaKING is a great pun.

That’s a great collection. You are so right about his style. I could devour one collection after another of tightly plotted and told short stories from King, but his novels are exhausting.

Good way to put it, I’m on book 4 of Dark Tower and it’s slow going, I’m rarely reading more than 25-50 pages in a sitting. I lose focus or desire to keep reading. With other stuff I can go on heavier binge reads.

1 Like

I’m halfway through 11/22/63 and it’s been a grind so far. The story is incredible and his writing is beautiful but hoooo boy it takes work to keep it all straight. So many characters developed, multiple timelines, super deep story telling.

I haven’t concentrated this hard while reading probably ever.

2 Likes