One last thing
Bill Haywood came out of retirement. Not posting for 4 months.
Immediately just starts posting terribly for hours
It was a justifiable time out
2 Likes
Because you didnāt bring up cruise stonks
3 Likes
full disclosure, i reported BHās third post with the same link he literally just posted 10 minutes prior, like he was literally just resetting the conversation back to the OP.
i thought a timeout was justified, though iād probably leave the posts in the thread, with a message it was a timeout.
RM may yet be a sucky mod, but he was not tyranical in this instance.
8 Likes
I literally have no idea who you are.
1 Like
Wow. I see the comedy portion of the thread has begun. Anybody who thinks Keed was ādoing a really good jobā as mod cannot be taken seriously on this matter.
9 Likes
Funstas itt
I donāt think we should be quick to ban people and donāt think we should be quick to remove people as mods. Give them a chance to respond to feedback and improve.
5 Likes
Anyone who thinks Riverman is doing a great job as mod but thinks Keeed had to go doesnāt have any particularly objective criteria for judging moderators; theyāve simply picked a side.
4 Likes
And seriously fuck off for playing into this absurd narrative that Iāve āpicked a sideā. You know better.
Just chiming in here to say that I agree 100% with silencing over banning. Iāll be sure to do this going forward as I see no downside. Thanks for the suggestion.
10 Likes
Since this forumās inception, I have supported 100% of the mods on this site. I went through creating a new system of mod rotation for the forum to help better the forum. But I raise concerns one time that a mod is moderating the forum in a negative manner for the community and driving posters off and Iām just an unobjective participant whose chosen a side?
If anything, my history here should give more credibility to the fact that Iām raising red flags on this, and should maybe give pause that it is those who support such a negative mod who have chosen a side at the expense of the community.
1 Like
yes, iāve picked a trigger-happy accountant from SC who hasnāt been a tyrant over a mod who decided it would be great to disseminate a bloviating russia policy professor who has apparently been shifting the blame since the '14 invasion, and a couple of weeks ahead of an invasion that *checks notes a neolib administration warned us about . 
1 Like
Referencing your own authority as proof of sincerity and reasonableness?
BRAVO!
1 Like
The JonnyA thing seems like a shit job
The BH thing was a great job.
Snap banning idiocy and snap banning being a shithead saves everyone a lot of time and effort and arguing. We should be beyond that stuff as a group.
Spirit of good decorum, not letter of the law. The latter leads to stupid ass nittery. That collateral damage from that is a temp ban for people who are not me is a risk Iām willing to take.
3 Likes
So when accused of being biased and just choosing a side, I shouldnāt defend myself by referencing my history of being impartial and not choosing a side here? Got it!
Donāt really have an opinion on removing RM but I support just having more mods so they can have a dialogue before making decisions because it did seem like RM had no one to consult as catfacemeowners isnāt here that often. I think the majority of the site, if a mod alongisde RM, would have talked him down from some of his actions.
P.S. lmao at banning for the forum malcontents
What if we make everyone a mod?
1 Like