What about accounts that are made to read when banned that then only engage in non-passive behavior like liking posts when the main account is no longer banned, and sometimes at the same time as the main account?
3 Likes
To me the wording seems clear that using alt accounts to post is only a problem when the primary account is under a ban.
2 Likes
Who could have imagined that team boot actually had no interest in reducing drama provided they were the ones controlling the narrative and the banhammer?
1 Like
NBZ had a concern about using likes to continue ongoing feuds, which could possibly extend to the use of multiple gimmicks to heart posts sarcastically, as demonstrated above. I enjoy the antics personally. But team boot professes to being troubled about the continuing drama while also actively stirring as much shit as possible, and of course Iâm fascinated by hypocrisy and love to point it out even though some are bored by it.
1 Like
Shit Iâm guilty and laughed at jmanâs antics - you got me. But again, Iâm not running around publicly crying about people stirring up shit while pretending that Iâm innocent. That would be you and your pals doing that.
Well gosh, thatâs why i amended his wording a bit.
Please, can you and @goofyballer please take your drama to the other threads? This could be an effective process without this pettiness from both of you. I didnât bump this to provide another place for bickering. I bumped it to try to solve a problem thatâs been brought up time and again in other threads.
We were having a productive conversation before this.
3 Likes
I was just providing an example of another angle shot loophole you might want to close while youâre still drafting the language.
thatâs the kind of thing that might fall under âother actions determined to be hostileâŚâ
What a dogâs dinner.
The distinction was not that it wasnât specifically called out by your language, but that it was outside of your âif a poster is bannedâ exclusion, but still clearly an effort to stir shit, even when itâs funny.
I can live with that language, but whatâs really important is using em-dashes.
How would you propose re-wording it?
Maybe we donât need to if we only want to keep it governing use of a gimmick while a main is banned.
Please vote to approve (or not) the wording for the following proposed rule:
Do you approve of the wording for this proposed rule?
- Yes
- No
0 voters
Poll closes 8/19/2021. If a majority votes in favor of the wording, the proposed rule will be put to a forum-wide vote.
Why canât they vote?
Yeah, I donât care much about gimmick accounts and hadnât paid much attention, but you get a temp ban and you canât vote? Seems Floridian. You canât vote twice obviously, but not once?
Have they tried not getting banned?
1 Like
Very Floridian of you.