I typed this up right as the throttle got to throttlin’ and was going to abandon it considering that ruined the joke, but now since Suzzer did what he did maybe it’s appropriate again, though I don’t know. I mean, the cat’s out of the bag at this point.
Reply 1:
This is a good ass post, “exegesis” is the type of word that gets my taint hairs tingling. But, I need to know if you’re going to lock the thread if I, not even, like, rebut, just reply in the spirit of vigorous debate and a little fun. I don’t even care which choice you make, but there’s a finite amount of keystrokes in a poster’s life and I’d just like you to do me the solid of letting me know upfront.
Reply 2:
I’m not going to post a super long reply if you’re not looking to get into a whole big thing, but, yeah I can see that. This isn’t a formal debate club so when speaking informally, opinions and question-begs can look the same, and the reader should be charitable and not assume one is question begging when they’re just speaking informally and off-the-cuff. However, while what you describe might apply to some posts 100%, it totally doesn’t to others, and there’s a sliding scale in between. Even sticking with the example of a quasi-abstraction such as “disruption/being disruptive” there’d still be degrees to which we could state things with more certainty than others, depending on how much subjective agreement we could arrive at about how abstract the disruption is; thus, the opinion-stater bears some responsibility as well. IMO, it’s just best practice to attempt to make it clear what is opinion and what is objective truth, and we even have a hand little acronym to do so.
I mean, I’m quickly giving less and less of a fuck but since everybody’s is surmising the what-ifs, yeah, what if a proud non-reader starts lying about the subforum, what happens then? Should we nip that in the bud right now or do we have to be more epistemologically certain that Suzzer just told a big arrogant lie? Will these questions be ignored? Do I need my magic 8-ball jpegs?