jfc. Here’s the result of the protest in Ramona.
On one side, you have the BLM folks
On the other side, the “defenders” of Ramona (according to a bunch of FB posts)
Literally more SDSO than protestors. Also, the second pic was taken by a member of a group of trump-flag waving no step on snek good ol’ boys who are parked in the gas station parking lot across the street.
That’s all good. Also with splitting groups, if you had people in groups from each neighborhood with like key fobs and key codes for different buildings, you could pop into buildings for safety and to get back “within the law” for periods of time to elude the police and move through the city in ways they can’t - at least not as quickly. Could also pop from one street to the next through block-wide buildings.
Also, calling in misinformation or having others at home do so would be effective. Also having people on rooftops scouting. Problem is organizing this, I dunno if it’s even wise to post it here. I’m not dialed in whatsoever for this stuff.
initially I hate the last point–could be very dangerous for whoever’s randomly there
I don’t know either, but I think it might be possible that they’re thinking they won’t get convictions. Chauvin’s guilt is graphic and obvious. It’s a much different situation for the other three cops. Again, I don’t know but they may be weighing the fallout of not charging them now or charging them and seeing them acquitted later.
extra-judicial repercussions. I guess this is what we’ll have to rely on going forward.
so it’s just like television where they don’t want to lose a case? lol
cops generally take months to get charged as it’s far more difficult of a case due to many factors (including juries, chauvin’s still got a chance, but that other medical examiner blunted his chances quite a bit) but ffs at letting two of them leave the state.
there aren’t enough resources to warrant many prosecutions of unwinnable cases just to make a point
I don’t understand why there was a private autopsy. So do they now have two autopsies with conflicting conclusions? Does the state use both of them at trial? I can see why the defendant might want a second autopsy, but I don’t understand why the victim’s family wants one.
Someone alert the Secret Service. There’s a fire in the president’s pants 
standing there why he choked the guy isn’t a winnable case? was the knee choke in the officer handbook?
I’m not qualified to answer other than it’s hard to get a conviction on an officer.
Potentially, but the main goal isn’t to have police chase all this down. It’s to drown out signal with noise and make their communications worthless.
If broad cross sections of people work together, it works in many ways. It makes police work way harder to get the same results, it burns up their morale, and it demonstrates their illegitimacy.
no, the defendant wanted the first one, not the second.
Yeah. I’m just brainstorming because I don’t understand it either.
The one cop has a great alibi, he was lecturing the bystanders about not doing drugs, and also never turned around to see what was happening.
I mean it can be as simple as my plan tonight if a cop was fucking with someone in my courtyard or on the one side of the building. Just have someone willing to use some white privilege to throw some misdirection. “Hey, OVER THERE! LOOTING! RUN! GET EM!”
We don’t have to play on Level 4 here. Level 1, “Hey, look over there!” will do it.
