What nuance? You explicitly said that Maher is not as bad as Rogan. A significant number of people are saying you’re right, he’s worse than Rogan.
The suggestion that Tanden is a hypocrite for being negative towards Rogan but going on Maher’s show does not require nuance. One can simply say that they are both bad enough that it doesn’t matter who is worse for the purpose of that accusation. Why does nuance matter in making that point?
This feels more like you quibbling over small, irrelevant details and not paying attention to the bigger picture of evaluating Tanden as a non-progressive.
And I absolutely think that your intent was to defend Maher. You have in the past.