LOL Democrats - So LOL we needed a 2nd thread

Wrong that city run stores would be the answer. The market for that industry is far too efficient, margins are so small. Even if you run it as even (really a loss after the initial investment), it is going to be rough to truly compete

Yeah I hate to be all gloom and doom on a Monday AM but I think maybe

1 Like

Yeah. Maybe. That’s probably the way I lean as well.

They tax the fuck out of them.

A city run grocery store can run at no profit or even a loss which gives it a leg up on stores that are only incentivized by tax breaks and hand outs. There would be details to work out so these served their intended audiences and didn’t cater to wealthy people looking for cheaper groceries, but those are details.

I’m no grocery store finance expert, but you’d think that overhead like rent and profit motives probably add a decent bit to the cost of goods sold. But, I’d imagine there are also supply chain/logistical things that bigger grocery stores do well that would be harder to replicate on a one-off (or small number of stores) basis.

1 Like

There are so many financial advantages afforded size in the business. Buying for a few stores is going to be expensive. I bought for thirty stores and we were seriously disadvantaged versus the bigger chains on pricing. Maybe suppliers will cut deals but I am not confident most will.

Most independent groceries belong to buying consortiums to help with pricing.

2 Likes

He’s already said that he won’t run them at a loss. I think that limits the tail risk of having unprofitable terrible government run companies.

Grocery stores have been government run and sometimes they do well, but I don’t think there’s some great need in New York for more grocery stores

As to why he’s talking about grocery stores I think the election strategy is that people are worried about high food prices so this a promise to help lower them and maybe that’s what people are responding to.

1 Like

I think the argument is supposed to be that Mamdani is going to be a constant punching bag for Fox News the same way they always go after AOC. Fair, I suppose, but how have the past 40 years of appeasing Republicans and trying to win over Reagan Dems worked out? Also, was Cuomo really doing great things for the Democratic brand? How about Adams?

1 Like

i’ve come around on the ā€œmamdani is a disaster for the partyā€. i think he probably is because the center dems and the dems that aipac own can’t help themselves but attack him and drive this wedge into the party. him existing and winning is a threat to the power that big donors have bought. i think the dems attacking him does far more damage to the party than foxnews running insane propaganda that just ends up highlighting his good policies.

Food prices might go up less in some stores than others, but they probably aren’t going down soon.

https://archive.ph/omg7g

I mean there’s nothing a mayor really can do to affect food prices up or down but talking about them could help him get elected

The mayor could open grocery stores, subsidize grocery stores, increase and promote food banks…there’s a lot a mayor can do…probably more than a President.

The rhetoric that he wants Jews killed or something is so obviously bad for Jews that it’s clear the Israel lobby, Evangelical Zionists, and Israel boosting politicians don’t care at all about anti-semitism.

Do you think Mamdani thinks there is a need for more grocery stores in NYC or do you think he’s just inventing it as an issue to score political points?

I know that sounds like a bad faith gotcha question but I legit don’t know much about him or the situation to judge whether it’s political theatre or a deeply held belief that he’s trying to act on.

The question wasn’t directed at me, but I think it’s hard to get great info on this. Lots of articles say that there’s a problem with food deserts. But then an AI summary says

Specific Examples:* South Bronx, Harlem, and Staten Island’s North Shore: These areas are frequently cited as struggling with food deserts.

I posted a Google Map of South Bronx showing lots of supermarkets, and I personally can’t think of an area of Harlem where you’re not 10 minutes walking from multiple options. What I missed in my previous post, though, and frankly was not aware of, is that these may exist due to subsidies and tax incentives from the NYC government. I’m not sure if there’s a way to tell which stores are benefiting from this and which aren’t.

If the government is spending money to subsidize these, then I can see a reasonable debate as to whether these dollars are better spent on these subsidies and tax incentives vs. creating some government operated stores. I’m guessing most economists would say the former is better, but I suppose a small trial of the latter couldn’t hurt.

2 Likes

Sounds more like you’re arguing ā€œthe party is a disaster for the partyā€, which I do agree with.

6 Likes

You posted a bunch of ā€œconvenienceā€ stores and at least one fancy health food store.

Where my (grown(ish)) daughter used to live there were two little market/convenience stores nearby, including one in her building, but they were crazy expensive. They weren’t fancy - more like convenience stores. And she doesn’t drive. Whenever I have been in the area I try go with her to a regular grocery store to stock up.