Even if they were willing to do that, they ain’t gonna sit down in the middle of a rally and hold a roundtable about it.
It’s a fucking rally, not a deep policy discussion.
Even if they were willing to do that, they ain’t gonna sit down in the middle of a rally and hold a roundtable about it.
It’s a fucking rally, not a deep policy discussion.
Anyone chanting would be pretty dumb if they couldn’t tell the difference between a workshopped pretend answer and something honest. She may well have not picked Shapiro in order to get these votes and there’s no way she’s going to say or do anything better than that. What she said seems like something she genuinely means and that’s better than just lying to the protestors.
Those may be the facts, but it’s naive to believe that his opponents won’t distort them and attempt to sabotage his character.
Anyone remember John Kerry? A combat veteran wounded in action, but by the time the right got through with him they made him look like a weeny coward.
https://x.com/NateSilver538/status/1821363595814334611
I feel like these guys are really seething more about not picking Shapiro than they are about the protestors.
Fuck the Hamas fans in MI, get the Jews in PA. Only people like @AngryQueer care about religious fundamentalists who persecute gays.
oh they totally are. Nate has been especially salty
John Kerry didn’t have VoteVets, a multi-million dollar PAC that is going to spend those multi-millions on IEs setting the record straight. Also, over 60% of the officer corps of the military identify as moderate or Democrats, which is a big change from 2004 (believe me, I was IN the military in 2004)
I don’t see Walz getting successfully Swiftboated, this team seems way more competent than Kerry’s.
Yikes
No, they didn’t. GWB only got 286 electoral votes when he was at war with two countries at a time when the Iraq War still had about 65% favorability. They tried to paint Kerry as a weeny coward, but it didn’t work and it wasn’t why he lost.
The Walz “retiring as” vs “retiring at” scandal won’t mean anything to anyone who just doesn’t want Walz there for other reasons.
Hope you guys are right. I’ll say no more.
The idiotic reactionary accusation that anyone who doesn’t want to kill 5 or 6 figures of people in Gaza is a Hamas fan is obviously idiotic and reactionary, but also the “get the Jews” thing is offensive. Buried about half an inch deep there is the old anti-Semitic trope about Jewish loyalty to anything other than Jews being suspect.
Nice antisemitism accusation. Anyway, my real point is that Angryqueer, like yourself, is an asshole.
How dare anyone listen to vibes instead of my antiquated data!
Perhaps. But those are all pretty much the only options to stay out of the “tacitly putting up with genocide” circle so I can see why people would be upset.
Wow, dude that just called AQ a self-hating traitor to gay people and a Hamas lover thinks other people are the assholes.
Hoo boy
The mask always slips
To be totally honest if I suddenly woke up Kamala tomorrow my strategy would be to say as little as possible until elected and then do everything I could to help Palestinians from being slaughtered. Tell Israel to cut the shit or the money train is cut off as long as I am president.
Not saying she is going to do that but I do think just sidestepping this issue mostly for now is the thing to do until you have power.
The fact that @simplicitus is capable of less nuance on this subject* than a kindergartener is of no surpise to anyone who’s ever poasted with him
*or any subject. He did part of a philosophy degree, you know