Trump is more likely to lose Montana than get 60%.
Itâs so wild how we pretty much unanimously accept narratives of states being like 90-100% something when theyâre really like 52%
I think the 65-60% spread represents the move if one guy changes his vote in Montana.
They are so so so jealous of the couch-fucking thing. Disinformation is their whole bag, and they got cut off at the knees by an amateur.
OK who here had camo Harris campaign merch on their list?
I think this is the real tweet (with a funny response).
If the election comes down to who can make the funniest memes, the notoriously unfunny right may lose every single electoral vote.
Holy fuck. Mrs Walz is awesome too!
So is the Walz military thing thatâs flooding my Twitter feed not a concern to anybody? Donât know whatâs true or not true, but the optics certainly arenât good.
No clue, but I imagine a lot of people retire from the military every year, and that includes years before we fire up yet another dipshit war.
Itâs only a concern for people who werenât voting for Harris/Walz:
Another National Guard member who served under Walz said that the future US lawmaker was eyeing a run for Congress earlier than 2005.
âWould the soldier look down on him because he didnât go with us? Would the common soldier say, âHey, he didnât go with us, heâs trying to skip out on a deployment?â And he wasnât,â Al Bonnifield recalled to Minnesota Public Radio of Walzâs concerns about dipping out before the deployment to Iraq.
âHe talked with us for quite a while on that subject. He weighed that decision to run for Congress very heavy [sic],â Bonnifeld added. âHe loved the military, he loved the guard, he loved the soldiers he worked with.â
âWe all do what we can. Iâm proud I did 24 years,â Walz has said about his service.
Part of the narrative is that he lied about or exaggerated his rank. Again, none of this stuff bothers me, but it is ammo for the other side to use when it originally looked like they had nothing.
Think that was covered here