And my calling it negligence is the most charitable way to frame it, since it’s not like he was some anonymous black person whom they failed to assess and chose to forget about.
He was a high profile suspect under the complete control of the facility, and yet he was allowed to kill himself.
The Los Angeles Times stated that the prison is often referred to as the “Guantanamo of New York”, and The New York Times stated that its administrative segregation units had severe security measures.
For sure. The question then is whether this was just routine incompetence on the part of some guards not especially caring about the safety of some pedo creep, or if the warden played a role or if this was a real conspiracy from higher up. The whole thing is gonna be like the Zapruder film only far, far worse: you can hypothesize all kinds of things and no one on either side will have any faith in the conclustions of the official investigation.
On the bright side, he was kind enough to leave a safe full of evidence.
IANAL, but I was under the impression from a while back that “gross negligence” is the term used when the alleged negligence starts to look like you were deliberately trying to be negligent.
I’m sure I’m paraphrasing but, “A lack of care that demonstrates reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, which is so great it appears to be an intentional violation of other people’s rights to safety, it is more than simple inadvertence.”