Jeffrey Epstein and Associates

:+1:

They are already working on the coverup

Seriously this isn’t a difficult one. On a Guiffre testimony based on her statements, Andrew didn’t commit a crime in London without additional testimony as I outlined above.

You also know that this took place before Epstein’s conviction, so you are demeaning yourself by bringing the phrase “known child trafficker” into the argument as once again there is no evidence of this.

Maxwell can “clear” things up, but it is difficult for her to get a plea deal on just giving up Andrew, as she has to screw herself completely in implicating him, when there might not be enough evidence to convict on that charge.

So here’s hoping she gives everyone up as that would seem to be her only chance. If she isn’t given that option then you have to ask what is going on.

It has been well known for a long time that Epstein trafficked girls. Even if it wasn’t well known, I would expect that an old man going to visit his friend and, weirdly, finding young girls there who fuck him would cause some suspicion. But what do I know.

1 Like

Just one question - how do you feel about lynchings?

You either believe in the rule of law or you don’t. When you say that someone is “defending a rapist” when he is actually clarifying the law, you are basically trashing the rule of law, just like trump.

I didn’t even see the flagged post getting flagged, it must have been the super quick Mod as it didn’t even appear on my reviews, I’ll remove the other post in question here too, for fairness.

My Brit comment was a joke, Tabs, I don’t care which of our countries you slag off, they both deserve ridicule, I’m only here to aid posters :joy: during a greivence :sob: sometimes. :eyes:

All jokes aside, no offence was taken and @davmcg is clearly wrong here on points.

Incorrect.

I said every Yank in that thread (at the time of posting ofc) was more patriotic than the rest of the world. The difference between those two statements should tell you something.

ok fuck you delete my account

Fucking right.

1 Like

There are so many possible public officials who could be implicated here. Barr? Trump? Bill Clinton? Dersh?

2 Likes

lol Trump knew about Epstein and young girls before his “conviction”

also I’m not arguing what can be proven in a court of law because UP isn’t a damn courthouse (and even if it can be proven no one will fall for this, hell Epstein had one of the sweetest deals ever for a child rapist), I’m just drawing conclusions based on what is known about this entire situation and Epstein

seriously you ppl don’t gaf about the rule of law and are simply unwilling to accept it when it apparently advantages someone repugnant

“rule of law”

1 Like

objection!

Get this dude out of this thread.

Ok, your point that we shouldn’t prejudge people based on heresay instead of evidence is correct of course.

But when we don’t have any actual presentable evidence yet (newspaper reports are often misleading), what should we do? Not discuss it?

How do you pronounce Ghislaine?

Wtf is this word salad?

Anyone involved with this should go down - end of story. It just happens to be super obvious Prince Andrew was involved.

Can we just stop arguing? Finally some good news and this is killing my vibe.

2 Likes

https://twitter.com/casey_bees/status/1278727428202876928

davmcgs twitter account exposed

2 Likes

i always pronounce it Jizz-Lane

3 Likes