It’d be pretty fucked up if it’s the same person
2 Likes
I just read something about this and it seemed like Maxwell’s lawyer was saying, “We’re done fighting this, the John Does all have their own representation to protect them” and there were a couple comments from those lawyers:
One of them, John Doe 17, wishes to keep their identity secret to avoid “annoyance and embarrassment,” the media outlet reported.
Another, “John Doe 151,” said that the disclosure of his name would lead to him being “hounded” by the media, and added that he wishes to maintain a “private life,”
OK good enough.
1 Like
Just in case it becomes relevant, according to a web site google suggested, there are only 237 John Does in the US.
1 Like
It’s been pointed out that a crime of men practicing pedophilia has only resulted in a women being convicted.
4 Likes
151? How many are there? 
Thanks! 
Also read somewhere that John Doe 45 said “it would make the fake news media go crazy on him” and that he expelled Epstein from his private club “long before most people even knew about Epstein”.
8 Likes
Newsmax Dersh asking the tough questions, remember there are two sides
Dershowitz: What if Prince Andrew were innocent?
1 Like
Dershowitz still out there trying to save his legacy or something? Cmon man, it’s over.
1 Like
I watched an interview with Dersh on this and I was left thinking man either this guy is innocent or he’s an incredible liar. I wonder how liars get that good, anyway? Is Dersh just born with it or is it decades of practice? No idea.
And it wasn’t that what he was saying was all that plausible, it’s just that he said it with such incredible confidence and certainty that it took me aback. Like if you do the thing where you write down what he said and post it in a tweet or something you’re just like, lol at this guy. But when you listen to him saying it you’re all, maybe, who knows, I’d probably take my family to Epstein Island 47 times too, who am I to judge. Guess that’s why he’s a great lawyer.
I don’t know but here are some words: it’s part of something we’re all born with and need to get by in life. We look at the world and guess at how things work. Test the guess and discard it if it doesn’t work. The line between working and not working isn’t so clear though. Liars are good at taking advantage of that to make what doesn’t work work for them. Law values that skill. Dershowitz was among the best of the best. I have no idea if he knows how far he over the line of plausibility he has gone.
Personality disorders are a massive advantage in modern society, given the complete lack of consequences for people with money.
1 Like
This is the foundational problem with impunity. It selects the worst possible people to run things.
Remember when the New York Times was like “well the law firm they hired to look into it said $158 million was for estate planning, nothing to see here?”
LOL this guy.
https://dealbreaker.com/2022/01/black-blames-harris-for-downfall
So how much is that going to cost UK tax payers I wonder?
Well you have to weight that cost against all the benefits of the monarchy.
3 Likes
2 Likes
John Cleese did a Q&A where he was asked, “Did the Queen kill Diana?” I guess this was kind of shocking at the time, even at a Monty Python show. His response was, “Well not with her bare hands, certainly.”
6 Likes
Huh. Well that’s not weird at all.
And another one bites the dust
https://twitter.com/muellershewrote/status/1495049240640249858?s=21
Queen’s got some loose ends to tie up before she abdicates.
9 Likes
COVID. Iron-clad alibi.