Housing is WAY worse.
This is not a take that has been posted on NMNM. Some people there might agree with the take, but it absolutely has not been posted there. Nice try, lol
No, you see, housing prices rising means the economy is good. Bobman, simp, suzzer, et al keep repeating this
what is NMNM?
Do you know what SPE is? It’s like that, but with very little overlap between posters
Nonzero overlap tho AFAIK
I think SPE is visible to the non-registered or signed out, and NMNM isn’t
Everything you claim to think is bad about the economy is better than it used to be.
The bad thing about the economy is that it’s harder for the bottom quartile to afford to live. It’s that simple. You keep being told this, and shown this, and keep thinking you’re fooling anyone by refuting it with un/employment numbers that you KNOW don’t tell the whole story. And we know you know, because we’ve seen you and your peers say as much when there’s Rs in the White House, lmao
Yes, they are referencing the things the ruling class wants you to think means the economy is good
Ok so the economy has never been good according to you for all of human history. Thanks, really insightful
They don’t mean that we have arrived at utopia and all economic problems have been solved.
Who says that’s what the economy is good means?
But that’s a character flaw of the people earning that according to mr bobman
lol faction wars. I’m done joining splinter groups just because people can’t play nice together. Here and the pony is plenty.
Who says that’s what the economy is good means?
You do, even if you don’t realize it. Literally the most prosperous time in world history is right now. Arguing that it’s not good means that we’ve never had a good economy, which I guess is kind of fair, you’re simply enforcing a standard. It’s not particularly descriptive or helpful though
Did anyone ask you to join a group?
Man you all are weird
Oh Ike’s, flailing around like usually.
Did anyone ask you to join a group?
They kind of did. To get the views from all the posters I like, I’d have to join. I think the weird ones are the people that can’t coexist in a virtual realm to the extent that we need to be a part of 6 separate fiefdoms instead of coexisting in one space like we did here in the beginning.
you’re the exact type of shitlib
Good fucking lord you’re a dumb asshole, aren’t you?
Jesus Christ you mouthbreathers!
You are not a good or smart person.
I know that discussions can get a bit heated and some of these responses were made as a kind of retaliation for others but posts like this are what derails discussions from the actual topic into ad hominems and other personal attacks. I’m not trying to be the tone police or anything just pointing out that a few sentences can be a detriment to otherwise productive discussion.
Fair enough I suppose, I don’t think it’s odd that people with completely different value systems don’t want to coexist in an online forum though. I’m ok mucking it up, in fact I think confrontation with different value systems is good for moving society forward.
Another thing, and this may just now be changing, is that for the last few years food and rent inflation has been higher than overall inflation, so the larger a percentage of your expenses are for food and rent, the higher inflation has been for you.
If you adjust for this, you get… the graph I posted!
There is currently a caste line in America between those who bought a home before interest rates went up and those currently renting.
I scrolled back and I don’t see what you’re talking about. If you were talking about real wages which are adjusted for inflation, that’s not the same thing as having a weighted adjustment which factors expenses that affect lower income people more than they affect upper income people, like food and rent.
Can you show a weighted adjustment that supports your argument? Because I don’t think you can