Enron Musk 3: The ongoing chronicles of a DOGEbag

Enron is a good nickname. How can you make it stick?

1 Like

This and the use of car batteries are both things. But there are significant problems to solve still. And Tesla isn’t in a better position than anyone else to solve them.

Unfortunately the biggest challenge to solve is that people don’t want to do it.

There’s this well known dynamic where energy nerds (like me) come up with these amazing products that are obviously good for the grid, good for the world, good for the company, and good for the customer.

And customers are just like

ā€œNah. I don’t want itā€

If ever I make the stupid step of doing a PHD, it might be on this topic.

Yeah I’m very happy we’re moving away from selling behavioral changes to actual DR management. Trying to get people to change their usage patterns is hard enough but then trying to prove you did it is just a nightmare. Much better to be able to say ā€œwe can flip this switch and reduce the usage curve by x kWā€ and then show it in the usage data from those homes.

Even then. People are reluctant.

ā€œI’ve just spent 10 to 15 on a battery. It’s for me not you. I don’t care about a few hundred bucks because I don’t trust you.ā€

And

ā€œThis is my car. Why would I let you discharge the battery. What if I need itā€

1 Like

I’ve heard people saying this all my life, but I don’t get it. It is pretty much always easier for me to go in front first than back out than it is to do it the other way around.

1 Like

The contracts with the utilities in California changed about a year ago so customers don’t get energy credit for energy they send to the grid and consequently residential energy storage is just about a given with solar now. And most customers are interested in configuring their system to save the most money.

So, the utility can very easily affect what many customers do with their stored energy by designing their rates and credits…and they do. Many people use their stored energy when rates are higher. If the utilities here went a step further and gave people decent credits for selling energy during peak times, they’d get people doing just that.

Are you bad at parallel parking?

I’m fine at it I think. I don’t even use my cars automatic feature for that (a large part is that I’m too lazy to figure out how it works).

If the space is not more than a foot longer than my car I’ll pass. I know plenty of people are OK with gently tapping the adjacent cars when parking, but I don’t do that, which is why I pass on really tight spaces.

The US showing off its big open spaces privilige.

Can’t explain it but there are spots here where it’s absolutely true. In & out are possible backing in but not vice versa.

If you are backing into the space, all you need to do is look at your side mirrors and make sure that you are in between the lines/cars. If you are parking forward facing, it is harder to line up and when you back out you can hit the cars next to you when you start turning.

1 Like

Lol bruhs…just find a pull-through space, ez game. I never have to back in or out of a space. Often this means I have to walk a little extra, but I like walking, hate backing in and especially hate backing out blind in my sedan between two fat-fuck SUV’s.

5 Likes

I’ve never had this difficulty in my life.

I’ve been told this is not an efficient way to manage system load. Large scale battery systems are a better option. I’m working on a couple projects right now that use Tesla’s commercial system called mega pack to do this. They involve 30 MW+ of these battery systems installed in sequence to manage and arbitrage power. I think that’s the more efficient solution although I’m not an electrical engineer obviously.

https://www.tesla.com/en_ca/megapack

1 Like

It’s geometrically easier to back a car into a tight space and drive out than the other way around. Cars aren’t symmetrical. When you turn going forward, the car rotates around the center of the rear axle, not the center of the car. This means that the rear wheels don’t follow the same path as the front wheels, which means that in a tight space, there’s a limit to how sharply you can turn without clipping the cars on either side.

It works differently in reverse. When you’re backing into the space, the turn pivots the front of the car away from the cars on either side, so there’s no risk of clipping once you have the rear end in.

It’s the opposite when you pull out, but it’s not critical when you’re leaving a confined area because your path is less constrained.

1 Like

It’s much easier to park centred on the parking spot line. Gives extra space when pulling in and out and you don’t have to worry about silly things like clipping other cars or them clipping you.

7 Likes

Big truck Trump flag douchebags always back in therefore I oppose it

8 Likes

yea and they (and honestly most backup parkers) completely disregard the flow of traffic in a busy parking lot, often will not signal at all, so when they blow past the spot and then stop to reverse, will look at you irritated or gesture if you inevitably didnt give them room (because they didnt signal and most of us are not mind readers), then you cant really do anything because there are now cars behind you (also getting frustrated)

dumb way to park in any kind of crowded lot. leaving spots in reverse is so god damn easy with modern camera and lidar tech. and my car is basically impossible to see out of.

Luckily we will have fully autonomous robo taxis in a few months so you’ll never need to park forwards or backwards. Just let your car go off and earn you money. Remember that hilarious muskism?

3 Likes

Continuing the discussion from Elon Musk: The Reichest Man Alive:

update on this, xAI said that ā€œmostā€ of the turbines were just idle and not running so they were technically in compliance with whatever regulation, of course that turned out to be an easily disprovable lie (someone apparently just flew a drone over)

2 Likes