English Premier League & Other Club Football Thread

:rofl:

1 Like

I wouldn’t write PSG off with that forward line.

I know they’ve got the superstars and Bayern have the team, and usually the latter prevails, but it’s a one-off game.

COME ON BAYERN

I’m not the best predictor of football I must admit & I’ve followed Bayern more than any other team in Europe except My beloved Celtic so I’m a bit biased for zee Germans.

And if there’s any team that’s gonna stop them it’s PSG & Mbappe + Bayerns defence ain’t the best. :grin:

Still, I expect them to take it down… I ain’t got any $ on bayern too so that’s a + for them. :blush:

https://twitter.com/Lee_Chappy/status/1296745535722999809

2 Likes

https://mobile.twitter.com/NorthStandNiall/status/1296889831356878849
https://mobile.twitter.com/stephmcgazz82/status/1296745058000089088

1 Like

https://mobile.twitter.com/EuropaLeague/status/1296915522668376069

https://mobile.twitter.com/cmonthehoops111/status/1296818832045211650

1 Like

image

1 Like

https://mobile.twitter.com/CelticFC/status/1297235090892824578

2 Likes

Inter Miami goes for their first point in club history in their 6th attempt today. Got my jersey on ready to roll.

1 Like

Would be cool if they didn’t earn a single point until Messi arrives.

I’d be ok with this

We did it lads. Couldn’t watch because I’m not paying for ESPN+ good job MLS really expanding the game.

2 Likes

In case anyone’s not aware of the corruption behind Sunday’s finalists PSG, their Qatari owners and EUFA:

1 Like

Not sure you read the article but none of the clubs you mention have owners with such obvious close relations with corrupt EUFA officials leading to obvious conclusions about how Qatar might have won the bid to host the world cup.

Also while your point about how purchase debt is loaded onto an EPL club by new owners is fair criticism, the same does apply to more important things in British life than football.

Yeah, its a legal way to purchase a company. Perhaps it shouldn’t be, but its not really a football issue.

That’s bad too. No one’s claiming purity here, but there are degrees of awfulness.

Take a look at the number of workers who died building stadiums for the Qatar world cup and the living standards they had to endure in a super-wealthy nation. Nothing that I’m aware of was done by FIFA to protect those people.

Before the Qatar takeover PSG were a fairly average top flight French club: in 40 years they’d won their mediocre domestic league just twice, and the old Cup Winners up once. No conventional business with such an unimpressive track record and prospects would attract such a huge investment, so your analogy falls down.

But that’s irrelevant because the point you’re missing in all this is that sport, as opposed to business, is supposed to be about competition on a playing field that hasn’t been artificially raised at one end by the injection of third party cash unrelated to the team’s success or maketability.

That after all was the principle behind the failed FFP that most people in football supported.

Football sans FFP begins to resemble an athletics race in which, instead of being content with the best training facilities and dieticians, runners with rich parents can also start much closer to the finishing line.

As you know, broadcasting revenues are apportioned according to league finishing position, not to some unsuccessful club that wines and dines Sky execs. I’d like to see the money more evenly distributed but this doesn’t contradict anything I said.

I didn’t expect to see you such an advocate of free markets when it comes to sports. I mean even the last bastion of free enterprise, the USA has a player draft to ensure that this sort of situation doesn’t happen there.

I’m not ignoring Sky’s money at all. If I had my way we’d kick them into touch and go back to how it all was pre-EPL when football was free to watch on TV and small teams like Notts Forest could go on to win the league by getting a great manager, buy some good players on the back of that success and win the European Cup, twice.

That’s how it’s supposed to be done - not by selling off all your assets to some shady billionaire who can at any point lose interest (or oil revenues) and turn your club into a shopping centre. Is that what you want?

The current situation was obviously seeded by Sky’s money but greatly exacerbated by aforementioned billionaires buying up clubs and investing huge sums in their latest toy.

Good. I’ve never understood why people are happy to be walking, unpaid sandwich boards.