Chess

No idea, I didn’t even realise they changed it and I don’t play anywhere else.

I have definitely made real rating gainz over the last year, I’d attribute this to:

  1. Watching agadmator’s videos, his analysis isn’t that groundbreaking but just seeing master games played through gives me a pattern-recognition idea of what the plans and pitfalls are in certain positions I think

  2. Being more patient in positions I hate. Sometimes you just have to play boring positions and make moves without having a plan, I used to try to force these positions too much (and probably still do).

2 Likes

I was on an agadmator kick for a while, but haven’t watched much chess analysis since the sinquefield cup. I recently tried going through one of those relatively detailed opening videos on the Taimanov Sicilian, which is what I tend to play probably with horrible results (mainly wanted to know wtf the difference between Paulsen and Kan).

I think I’ve gotten stronger positionally this year, a better appreciating for dominating squares whether it’s putting knights in the right places or more actively going for bishop pairs. I’ve also developed less of a hatred for boring symmetrical positions. All my sacrifices remain frivolous and I still don’t know how to queen/mate with king and pawn with opposition.

I’ll try playing a bit more on lichess, if you want you can add me my account is UnstuckPatzer

1 Like

Y’all ever play real people across the board? I’m thinking this would be a way to meet some people around where I live.

Just with friends, they suck plus I don’t know, I don’t like it, so used to the screen at this point. I don’t have any particular read on the types of people you’d meet at a club these days, can’t be any worse than casino regs though.

I play real life occasionally, people vary but most are not particularly sociable, I wouldn’t recommend it as a way to meet people.

Anywhere you’d recommend to learn the Taimanov smrk4? I hate my repertoire against e4 as Black (mostly the Qa5 Scandinavian, it’s awful).

This is the one video I looked at about it, I just noticed that I tended to play e6 a fair bit and this is one of the common ways to go in the French Sicilian.

But tbh I can’t say there’s anything particular about it that I understand and use to exploit, I just know some of the lines 8-10 moves deep and that’s it. I only play blitz, I should just trash it an play some fianchetto dragon.

Most chess players are too weird to enjoy playing them in real life.

Najdorf > Taimanov.

Yeah I actually did some googling after my last post and decided to take up the Najdorf. I’ve always been scared of it because of the fearsome amount of theory, but I doubt I’m ever actually going to get a theoretical battle. I’m probably just going to get endless anti-Sicilians anyway, I play an anti-Sicilian myself (the Smith-Morra).

2 Likes

I love it and how the Sicilian coiled spring unwinds.

I don’t know many critical positions that are bad for black (the long variation where white castles long with Bg5/f4/Qf3/g4/g5/f5/f6 bothers me but that’s the only long line you’ll need to know) and if you get b4 and d5 in you should be in great shape. Even one of those is often enough for equality.

As well as the queenside attacks I also like the lines where white prematurely exchanges pieces on d5 only to find himself faced by blacks e and f pawns bearing down on him.

All that said I enjoy facing it with white too and play a 150 Attack brainless donk formation with f3, Be3, Qd2, OOO and a pawn storm as fast as possible to gain time and hopefully sac somewhere in the approximate vicinity of the black king

To those who care about such things — I do a little, that’s why it’s fun — do you count wins towards your all important chess esteem when you win against higher rated opponents when they blunder? Just had a game against a near 2200 and I missed a sexy idea that would have made it a near masterpiece by my standards, but he ended up with a crushing position and blundered it away in a dumb way. Not into an instant loss but into something I had to covert and eek out. Anyway, I’m not inclined to care about getting lucky in a lost position. I also don’t count any games with 1 blunder on my side as good games, even if there’s some good tactics in them.

:chess_pawn: With some run-good I took UnstuckPatzer to 2002 blitz, personal best on lichess, but the level of play feels 1830-60ish as compared to chess .com. For comparison, I’m around 1770 atm on chess .com and that puts me in their top 96% as compared to 90.8% here. Probably chess .com has a much larger pool with shittier players. I am pleased nonetheless. :chess_pawn:

2 Likes

:D

1 Like

Now to never play again :D

1 Like

You’re not going to try to beat my 0.11 > your piddling excuse of a rating?

JK good job, I’m also semi retiring from lichess for now. Did you win mostly on merit or on time/luck like me? I made all new top 5 opponents beats yesterday/today and I don’t think I was winning from start to finish in any of them.

brb, challenging some 1100 players

1 Like

The game that put me over the top just then was luck. A 2100 player blundered his queen for a rook in a position where he was +1.7. Stockfish has me making 0 inaccuracies after that though so at least I’m clutch if not actually good. Here’s my YTD graph:

Definite signs of improvement imo but I’m on a heater and will probably settle back down around 1900.

1 Like

I’m not serious about never playing again but it’s amusing that if you look at the distribution of blitz players you can see what appears to be the result of people doing that, with peaks at the 100s:

2 Likes

In celebration of 2000 rating, I thought I’d give a quick guide to one of the few bits of my opening repertoire I actually really like.

A Super-Quick Patzer’s Guide to the Vienna Game

1. e4 e5
2. Nc3

The fun part of the Vienna is the opportunity to frequently play f4 or, sometimes, an early Qg4. People frequently aren’t sure what to do here. Let’s start with:

2. … Nf6
3. f4

It’s quite natural to take here, but it’s bordering on unplayable for Black.

3. … exf4
4. e5

The knight must make an ignominious retreat to g8. Qe7 doesn’t help; just Qe2 and it’s the same deal. After the knight retreats you just play Nf3 (don’t allow Qh4+!), d4 and so on. If they play d6, intending takes/takes and exchanging queens, just allow them to take, then Qe2 pinning the pawn and recapture on e5 after that. It’s a miserable position for Black, lots of fun as White, I win most of the games where this happens.

A better try is d5 instead of exf5, where I like:

3. … d5
4. fxe5 Nxe4
5. Qe2 Nxc3
6. dxc3

Black can play moves other than Nxc3, but I have literally never faced any other move. The plan here is simple: overprotect e5 and make it a strong point, castle long and enjoy your space and open lines. I think it’s technically an equal position, but I have a lot of fun playing it.

Responses to 2. Nc3 other than Nf6: if d6, I just play f4 immediately. If Bc5 or Nc6, I aim for the following line:

3. … Nc6
4. Bc4 Bc5
5. Qg4

Here, 90% of the time Black is like “Qf6, no brainer, defend g7 and attack f2”. However, this runs into an awful shock.

5. … Qf6
6. Nd5! Qxf2+
7. Kd1

Believe it or not, Black is in trouble here. It gets complicated, but White is threatening to do three different things:

  1. Take on g7 and take the rook (but you must be careful about Black returning fire with Qxg2)
  2. Play Na3 and when the queen goes to d4, play d3 and threaten to trap the queen with c3
  3. Fork on c7

It’s very complex and not always easy to convert, but to give you an idea of the kind of trouble Black is in, the engine-recommended move is Kf8 with +1.53 (depth 28) and everything else is +3 or better. Of the alternatives to 5. … Qf6, the most important to know is g6, where you play Qf3, also with an advantage for White. I’d say I face Qf6 about 90% of the time, though.

If Black doesn’t cooperate, generally it’s because he developed both knights instead, whereupon I play d3 and then f4 in response to just about everything. I think f4 is actually bad for White in some lines here, but I don’t know or care which, because my opponents don’t know which either. The position is flexible. Sometimes I maintain the pawn on f4, but if Black castles early I’ll frequently play f5, shutting down the light square bishop and providing a fulcrum for a kingside attack. Sometimes if I haven’t played Nf3 yet, it even goes g6, trying to get rid of the pawn chain, and I can just reply g4. Sometimes things go wrong, but it’s fun and there are a lot of opportunities.

Beyond a few subtleties here and there, that’s honestly kind of it. The above is enough to go give it a try yourself.

4 Likes

I’m going to start playing this, I like some stuff in the Ruy Lopez but the amount of times they play Berlin makes the whole thing net pretty joyless.