Nobody is claiming that Gates will get a financial windfall from the vaccine. The claim is that Gates’ wealth, like most all wealth, is dependent upon the enforcement of laws that define ownership. IP is one of those things that people can own and profit from, so is owning a shit ton of stock in Microsoft, or owning a shit ton of farm land. All of those are things that Gates owns and they constitute his wealth. They are not laws of physics, they are human constructs. So, if IP law gets tossed to the side when it comes to a pandemic because unless we are sociopaths, we should be prioritizing the well being of humans over the profits of the few, then what’s next? Next thing you know we’ll be prioritizing human well-being over the rest of Gates wealth also.
Gates has a history of acting like he cares about poverty. That’s what philanthro-PR is designed to do. But because he’s one of the GOAT wealth hoarders, he has a difficult(some would say impossible) time imagining systemic change that would alleviate the root causes of poverty, because those changes would also negatively impact his wealth hoarding. So, he’s left advancing policy proposals that maintain the status quo, addressing symptoms but not the root causes of poverty.
When I chat with people IRL about Gates, general points of disagreement stem from a difference in perspective which is due to the success of his philanthro-PR, and the rest of the propaganda that attempts to justify the results of a socio-political system that creates obscenely wealthy billionaires while other humans lack basic resources.
The facts are: Gates is without a doubt one of the GOAT wealth hoarders. Knowing how people tend to view that level of greed, he has promised to give away all of his wealth (after death, ofc). He currently “gives away” portions of his wealth to his own foundation. And since he announced his intentions to do full-time philanthro-PR his personal wealth has increased, while he gets bent out of shape when people propose taxing his wealth away.
If we consider wealth hoarding to be an addiction (it is), and Gates to be an addict (he is), then we could compare him to other addicts.
Imagine if Gates was the GOAT narcotics hoarder of all time. Knowing how people would tend to view his hoarding, he promises to get clean by giving away all his drugs (after he dies, ofc). He currently “donates” some of his drugs to his own foundation. And in the past two decades Gates has actually doubled the amount of drugs that he has hoarded, while he gets bent out of shape when people propose distributing his stash before his death.
Would people credulously believe that drug hoarder Gates is anything other than an addict, who in fact is not actually committed to getting clean? I would hope not, even if people who Billy had given some of his drugs to said he was a swell guy.
Some people will still continue to listen to Gates’ comments like Mr. Show’s Worthington’s Law (more money=better than) is a real thing. Others will listen to Gates with a level of skepticism impacted by the understanding that we’re hearing the words of an addict who’s high on his own supply, and therefore can’t countenance systemic changes that would alter his GOAT-tier addict status.