2024 US Presidential Election (Taylor's Version)

[eyebooger]

@Trolly

Man, we’re all just tired of hearing about the orange guy and his angry, violent cult of dipshits every single day for years and years

Is this about Trump or lagtight?

[Trolly]

yes

[BusinessGenius]

https://x.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1820770514924655085

[m_reed05]

Can we just make ok weirdo the new ok boomer?

[WichitaDM]

@Ikioi

Is there anything inherently appealing about Kamala as a presidential candidate other than the fact that she’s not geriatric and not Donald?

She would have been my 3rd pick behind Bernie and Warren in 2020. She will be the most progressive president of our lifetimes most likely and it won’t likely be close.

[MrWookie]

Do they break down gender representation by age group? Young voters are even more polarized by gender than the rest of the population.

[LKJ]

@MrWookie

Do they break down gender representation by age group? Young voters are even more polarized by gender than the rest of the population.

Nah, 50/50 gender split in the numbers and 27% of the pool is in that age group, but there’s no sub-split listed that clarifies gender within age group. This could be right that the young age group is disproportionately male (which was a Trump +14 demo overall).

[Danspartan]

Sex is only for procreation. Babies are gods reward. Or if you do it just for fun outside marriage especially, then, babies are punishment.

[CanadaMatt3004]

Very relatable. I ceetainly want to see these guys in power. Not weird at all

[EmpireMan]

@lagtight

I agree with the RCC position that sex should only be for procreation.

ok weirdo

[LKJ]

https://x.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1820849847773040678

All show movement toward Harris since the previous poll, but still work to be done. This would be a loss even if WI/NV were tossed into the blue pile.

[LFS]

@Slighted

adin ross. he streams to mostly teenagers from what i understand. he’s extremely unintelligent if it’s not some kind of bit. he streams on kick the rightwing/edgelord version of twitch. kick is basically a front to get young people addicted to online gambling through streaming. it was founded by an online gambling company after twitch started to crack down on it i believe… they pay out some huge contracts and mostly try not to moderate too much.

he also famously sniffed andrew tate’s chair after he finished interviewing him.

[dlk9s]

Remember when people thought Barron would be the normal/decent one?

[VoteForSocialists]

it didn’t make headlines, but it caused outages for a weekend.

@hokie

@VoteForSocialists

the other aspect is that fsb/gru had an apparent plan to sabotage the olympics, which partially succeeded with the attack on the french railroad network

Arsonists attack French high-speed rail system hours before opening...

[Twist]

More of this type of advert please:

[VoteForSocialists]

@suzzer99

[Riverman]

I had to check 3 times to make sure this one is real

https://x.com/adamschiff/status/1820918129603543389?s=46&t=XGja5BtSraUljl_WWUrIUg

[CanadaMatt3004]

Oh

My

God

IS THAT JOE BIDEN’S MUSIC?!?!?

[hokie]

The eyebrow was at the claim that Russia did it, based on vibes I guess?

[Huehuecoyotl]

@lagtight

@Huehuecoyotl

x.com

THAT’S THE DEMOCRATIC POSITION. THEY’RE THE ONLY ONES WHO WANT TO MATERIALLY HELP FAMILIES. The Republican position is that women have had it too easy and we got to force them to have kids.

No, that is not the Republican position. Of course, you know that is not the Republican position. But it’s unlikely in my opinion than anyone other than me will call you out on this nonsense since I’m not part of the UP Support Group for Disgruntled Libs.

@Huehuecoyotl

It’s definitely a pithy summary of the difference in policy. To be more explicit, the only major constituency for increasing the material help for most things related to children are Democrats, because while Republicans may make general motions about caring about families, the combination needing to assert conservative sexual mores and aversion to the normal welfare state, that is assistance to the poor, means that at most there’s not going to be much in the way of actually helping the families, especially new families who are relatively more poor than others, while plenty of movement in rolling back women’s choices. At most I’d say there’s going to be the Quiverfull Tax Credits that, as usual, benefit rich families and leave poor, new or old, families out.

Hell there was even one of those “Trump’s turned over a new leaf” acts but with anti abortionists where conservatives were saying “Now that we’ve banned abortion, it’s time to open up support for new mothers.” Of course, like Trump, things just kept being the same.

In fact, I’m going to bet if you were to do a scatterplot of support for families against abortion restrictions, I’d almost bet you’d see a strong inverse correlation between material support for women, infants, children and families and abortion restrictions.

Btw I wrote that before seeing the Walz interview, but this clip is basically what I said

https://x.com/AesPolitics1/status/1820865914117689413