Don’t you think if there was something as counter-intuitive and counter to every other (non-personal foul) NFL rule as “it does not matter if the play is blown dead, the player still has to hand the ball to the ref without walking into the end zone” it would be explicitly called out?
Like does every rule in the book need to say “only applies before the whistle blows”.
MacAulay is being really weird too, refusing to acknowledge the whistle at all - like it doesn’t matter and he can’t even understand why that part is confusing us. Makes me think he’s backed himself into a corner and can’t admit he might be wrong.
I mean does it really make any sense that if the player is in the middle of the field and the ref is 20 feet away, the player needs to avoid the end zone line as he walks the ball to the ref? Have you ever seen a player do that?
I guess they usually just place the ball on the ground. Which could explain some of the weirdness. But again, I really don’t think it’s 100% clear by that rule that a player can’t walk into the end zone with the ball after the play is blown dead.
This is what MacAulay is talking about. But it seems very different because the whistle hadn’t even blown yet. It’s like he’s confusing dead ball and dead play.
They literally talk about listening for the whistle!